Pro-life article March 2008

In the Windsor Star’s 1-19-08 edition, page A11, an individual states concerning the world of religion (GOD) & the world of science (evolution theory) "WHERE’S YOUR PROOF? IT’S NOT UP TO ME TO PROVE ...." This means some basic presumptions are made by the speaker: i.e. he/she has the personal knowledge, experience, skills etc to understand the explanations offered in respond to the statement ‘where is your proof’. Unfortunately, in this case as in most similar situations, the person does NOT possess the necessary knowledge, experience or skills required to comprehend what is taking place. Very sad, too bad.

The Catholic way (contextual approach vs creationism) to read Sacred Writings is very simple ... you want the meaning(s) intended by their various authors and editors, who, over the hundreds of years created these Sacred Records (revelation) about the relationship between God & people, between people and people & life/creation .... reality. When an individual, over time matures, and becomes aware of the complexities, the complications of life/reality, it becomes possible for the invisible to become visible. One learns "God in Christ walks the talk."

A response to "Creationist leaders a threat: Scientists" in the Windsor star 1-5-08 pg. c10

If a person asks the question "HOW DOES LIFE-CREATION (reality) WORK?" one learns life-creation is absolutely reasonable & logical, extremely practical and pragmatic, not mysterious (cosmic DNA) and the world of Religion has a more profound, insightful understanding concerning life-creation (reality) than the world of science. And I thought from fatherhood’s perspective, "how dangerous are scientists to others?" i.e. atomic bombs .. politicians declare war on ??? & media & science + others support the destroying of 400+ Canadian lives/persons in the womb on a daily commercial basis as a paid for human right in fortified abortion facilities & !!! academics, media, + other persons attack, reject world of religion, pro-life people .... etc ...

After watching the Canadian broadcasting’s passionate eye "war on science " would it be fairer, more justice, more logical to state/think, "reason vs the new religion of "science" with its "evolutionary theory" as the basis, is simply a presentation by normal & natural present time/era humans ??? The religion of evolution-science & its believers, persons of this faith, has all the same human characteristics (attitudes & behaviours) other "?holders of the truth?" over the ages have had as they attacked, those others citizens viewed as ugly and evil unbelievers, as the new "priest-scientists" pointed them out for punishment and destruction. In fact, would it be fair, justice to say "the most positive aspect of evolutionary theory is the JOBS created at the level of academic, scientific, media institutions - one hour program with twenty minutes of commercial income." The world of science = the creators of atomic bombs, cruise missiles, apache attack helicopters, abram tanks and millions of deaths/ABORTIONS of persons, lives in the wombs of women/mothers as a "right" paid for in Canada by the governments. When you stress the negative it is easy to belittle others, which I have learned to do by watching, listening & imitating you, the cbc, pbs, academics, politicians, justices, etc ..... life stable and unchanging over the millennia ..... Science a religion with its own ?myths? .... evolutionary theory. Science’s points of reference are so narrow "evolutionary theory", is it reasonable to state "so what, who cares" ... has it eliminated the poor, the homeless, the disillusioned, hatred, hopelessness, etc. of daily life .. (watch news programs & house of commons in Canada discussions) ... while it, science & media/academics, continuously attacks others for a variety of reasons .... Remember, the world of religion founded many universities, school systems, hospitals, other social agencies to serve peoples’ needs.

In NOVA’S: "Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial" an evolutionist person states: ... the fundamental problem about intelligent design is you can’t use it to explain the natural order: does it tell you what the designer did, what the designer used, what the designer’s purpose is, does it tell you when the designer did it, why the designer did it ... etc ... These questions/comments reveal clearly & beyond doubt science’s shallow, superficial, unsophisticated understanding of the world of religion & its hundreds, thousands of years of lived, reflected on experience by a wide variety of persons, groups from a variety of places & times and which has been continuously analyzed by countless others as life went/goes on and on. Evolutionists are without an in depth understanding concerning life and are just limited to one small, narrow-mined aspect concerning the complexities of reality, life, creation (the human condition). They are extremely limited to just one of life’s many varied tiny areas but complicated aspects life, a society, a nation, a civilization ??? !!! What think you about "thems" as they continue their attacks on us’s .... people of religion, pro-life individuals, etc.

IF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS CORRECT ... SO WHAT, WHO CARES, WHAT HAS IT DONE FOR HUMANITY LATELY ... ??? ... SCIENCE, JUST THE NEW RELIGION, WITH ITS OWN MYTHS ... REASON VERSES SCIENCE ?? AND DESTRUCTION, WARS, DEATH GO ON ..

HOW PRACTICAL & PRAGMATIC is LIFE‘S personal AGENDA - How sophisticated is the "world of religion" ?.. What do you favour/believe in: A SWEET PLASTIC JESUS .... HE DIED FOR ME/YOU BECAUSE OF OUR SINS OR A CRUCIFIED CHRIST WHO WAS ARRESTED as a criminal, TRIED as a criminal, TORTURED as a criminal AND EXECUTED as a criminal BECAUSE HE WAS A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL ?? (study in depth "jesus christ, superstar")